From: Bruce Williams (bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 02 2002 - 12:03:45 GMT-3
That is what I figured. I will ask the proctor, but at least I know that I
am not the only one who does that. I guess that is all I was really looking
for. I kind of wanted to see if anyone else did the same thing and you
validated that for me.
Thanks,
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@ldd.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 10:38 AM
To: 'Bruce Williams'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OSPF - practice approach
Save that question for the proctor. I suspect each test would be
different. Aren't you assuming all tests have ospf? Heck you may get
ISIS.
The short answer is that we don't know, and if we did know, we couldn't
tell you.
BTW, I do the same thing, it seems to be a standard practice. Here's my
routing table from last night's lab.
Gateway of last resort is not set
1.0.0.0 0xFFFFFF00 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
2.0.0.0 0xFFFFFF00 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 2.2.2.0 [90/2809856] via 10.1.1.26, 14:30:33, Serial0
3.0.0.0 0xFFFFFF00 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 3.3.3.0 [90/2297856] via 10.1.1.2, 14:30:24, Serial1
4.0.0.0 0xFFFFFF00 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 4.4.4.0 [90/3321856] via 10.1.1.26, 07:42:02, Serial0
5.0.0.0 0xFFFFFF00 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 5.5.5.0 [90/2297856] via 10.1.1.26, 14:30:33, Serial0
6.0.0.0 0xFFFFFF00 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 6.6.6.0 [90/3321856] via 10.1.1.2, 07:42:02, Serial1
7.0.0.0 0xFFFFFF00 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 7.7.7.0 [90/2809856] via 10.1.1.2, 14:30:24, Serial1
10.0.0.0 0xFFFFFFFC is subnetted, 7 subnets
D 10.1.1.8 [90/3193856] via 10.1.1.2, 14:30:24, Serial1
D 10.1.1.12 [90/3705856] via 10.1.1.2, 07:42:02, Serial1
[90/3705856] via 10.1.1.26, 07:42:02, Serial0
C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1
D 10.1.1.4 [90/2681856] via 10.1.1.2, 14:31:24, Serial1
C 10.1.1.24 is directly connected, Serial0
D 10.1.1.16 [90/3193856] via 10.1.1.26, 14:31:34, Serial0
D 10.1.1.20 [90/2681856] via 10.1.1.26, 14:31:34, Serial0
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bruce Williams
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 8:47 AM
To: Andre Riscalla; Michael Popovich
Cc: Bauer, Rick; 'Jerry Haverkos'; Ademola Osindero;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OSPF - practice approach
I know this is a queston for the proctor, but I am curious now. In the
lab,
do you know if you are allowed to create your own loopbacks and make
those
loopbacks your router ids. For example, could I create a loopback with
addresss 1.1.1.1 for R1 and 2.2.2.2 for R2 etc?
Bruce Williams
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Andre Riscalla
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:41 PM
To: Michael Popovich
Cc: Bauer, Rick; 'Jerry Haverkos'; Ademola Osindero;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF - practice approach
In that case, i think a good practice is to nail it down and configure a
router-id under each and every OSPF process... if it's not otherwise
specified in the lab, you can do it.
AR-
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Michael Popovich wrote:
> You'll just need to remember the rules that if you have loopback
interfaces
> the highest IP wins. If you add them later you'll need to change the
> configurations for the virtual link or upon a reboot it is broken.
>
> MP
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bauer, Rick" <BAUERR@toysrus.com>
> To: "'Jerry Haverkos'" <jhaverkos@columbus.rr.com>; "Ademola Osindero"
> <osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:34 PM
> Subject: RE: OSPF - practice approach
>
>
> > And what happens when you add more loopback interfaces and reload
the
> > router? What if you have virtual links? Nail it up!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jerry Haverkos [mailto:jhaverkos@columbus.rr.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:56 PM
> > To: Ademola Osindero; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: OSPF - practice approach
> >
> >
> > A router-id will be picked for you, automatically.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf
Of
> > Ademola Osindero
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:02 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: OSPF - practice approach
> >
> >
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > I working on approaches of answering ques in the lab. Do I really
need
to
> > put a router id on my routers while configuring OSPF....am I allowed
to
> > just pick up an ip address and use it?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Osindero Ademola
> > Schlumberger Network Solutions
> > Tel: 234 1 261 0446 Ext 5427
> > Fax 234 1 262 1034
> > email:osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:21 GMT-3