From: David Ham (ccieau@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 31 2002 - 19:34:54 GMT-3
Tony,
It looks like synchronisation problem.
Do the " NO SYN" or try match Router ID on BGP and OSPF.
David Ham
OPTUS
>From: Tony Russell <trussell@ibeam.com>
>Reply-To: Tony Russell <trussell@ibeam.com>
>To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: BGP into ospf
>Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:39:08 -0500
>
>I am trying to redistribute some BGP routes into OSPF.. one of the routes
>is
>making it and the other is not.... I am unsure as to why.. can anyone shed
>any light on this???? I am wondering if there is anything specific that I
>should know about BGP to OSPF redistribution that I am obviously missing.
>Here are some specifics
>
> 172.168.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
>B 172.168.70.0 [20/170] via 137.20.10.70, 00:10:46
>B 172.168.80.0 [200/170] via 137.20.86.1, 00:00:49
>
>The 172.168.70.0 route is making it to the next router but the 172.168.80.0
>is not.
>
>Here are the bgp entries
>
>*> 172.168.70.0/24 137.20.10.70 170 0 3 i
>*>i172.168.80.0/24 137.20.86.1 170 100 0 1 i
>
>The 80 route shows the i for iBGP, but I thought it should still make it
>into OSPF
>
>Here is the redistribute command
>redistribute bgp 2 metric 1592 subnets
>
>Lets say that R1 has the BGP routes and R1 and R2 are running OSPF....
>after
>redistributing BGP into OSPF I fully expected both routes to show... but
>only one does....
>
>Tony Russell
>Media Engineer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:13 GMT-3