Re: using LOAD for IGRP

From: kris.keen@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue May 28 2002 - 21:23:39 GMT-3


   
correct.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Kris Keen - CCDA, CCNP, CNE
Network Support Specialist - Network Systems
Aon Risk Services Australia Limited
(612) 9253 7272
0404862970
E: Kris.Keen@aon.com.au

                    "Nick Shah"

                    <nshah@connect To: "John Mistichelli" <jmistichel
li@yahoo.com>, "Joe Morabito"
                    .com.au> <joe.morabito@cox.net>, <ccielab@grou
pstudy.com>
                    Sent by: cc:

                    nobody@groupst bcc:

                    udy.com Subject: Re: using LOAD for IGRP

                    29/05/2002

                    09:46 AM

                    Please respond

                    to "Nick Shah"

If I am not mistaken, Joe's Q was that is bandwidth required to be
specified
on the interface if load was to be taken into consideration(by specifying
metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0), to which I had replied that if actual b/w is
specified, load is calculated according to that, otherwise load is
calculated based on default b/w (eg. 1544 for serial)..

Correct ?

Thanks
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Mistichelli" <jmistichelli@yahoo.com>
To: "Nick Shah" <nshah@connect.com.au>; "Joe Morabito"
<joe.morabito@cox.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: using LOAD for IGRP

> Hey Guys,
>
> The equation is as follows:
> Metric = K1 * BandW + (K2 * BandW)/(256-load) +
> K3*Delay
>
> The values default to:
>
> K1=1
> K2=0
> K3=1
> K4=0
> K5=0
>
> If you set K2=1 load will be taken into account.
> Try the command:
> metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0
>
> Reference: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/3.html
>
> Hope that helps
> John
> 7536
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:11 GMT-3