From: David Ham (ccieau@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 28 2002 - 11:48:47 GMT-3
Hi all,
Thanks for all your responses. I was trying to do some testing on BGP
without synchronisation on and with synchronisation on.
My first test was without "syn on"
I put "NO SYN" at R1,R3,R2 ( not R3,R5,R4 -- typo below) --sorry.
with "NO syn" at R1,R3,R2 now I can see all the routes at routing table (
ping OK).
My second test was with "Syn ON"
I put "SYN" at R1,R3,R2 and redistribute bgp into ospf at R1 and R2.
I also matched router-id of ospf and BGP on R1,R3,R2 ( eq 17.17.17.17 --
ospf/bgp router-id for R1, 18.18.18.18-- ospf/bgp router-id for R3,
19.19.19.19 --ospf/bgp router-id for R2 )
I can see the routes in R1,R3,R2's routing tables but as ospf learned routes
( I guess this is because ospf has lower AD ). On R1 and R2, when I do the
sh ip bgp x.x.x.x I see NOT Synchronised. -- I think this is because the
routes are learned by ospf.
Please comment if you see any doubt.
Regards,
David Ham
OPUTS
>From: "David Ham" <ccieau@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "David Ham" <ccieau@hotmail.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: BGP route-reflector
>Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 22:57:06 +1000
>
>Hi all
>
>I need help. I am working on BGP router-reflector-client.
>Here is my scenario.
>
>R7(as10)--172.168.55.1 & 12.168.66.1
>|
>R1(as3)------R3(as3)-------R2(as3)---2.2.2.2
> RR
>
>R1,R7 ebgp
>R1,R3,R2 IBGP also running OSPF
>R3 is route-reflector.
>add next-hop-self at R1 to point to R3
>
>Here is my question.
>I put no syn on R3,R5,R4 -- I can see all the route at R2's BGP table but
>not on R2 routing table why?
>
>any suggestion??
>
>
>Regards,
>David Ham
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:10 GMT-3