From: Tom Young (gitsyoung@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 26 2002 - 13:28:41 GMT-3
Sorry, I forgot tell you , The computer's gateway setting
is very well.
The Cisco's e0 is 192.168.0.254, and the computer's
gateway was also set by 192.168.0.254
Thanks
Young
--- Michael Snyder <msnyder@ldd.net> $B$+$i$N%a%C%;!<%8!'(B
> Did the workstation have a gateway set?
>
> Better yet, the ibm router didn't know about the
> existence of the
> 192.168.0.0/24 network. No return path, no ping.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Tom Young
> Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 10:27 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: a interest question
>
> I very interest question that I had been
> encountered.
>
> A Cisco 3600, e0 port was 192.168.0.0/24 , e1 was
> 192.156.15.0/24, e0 and e1 are connecting with one
> switch.
> A IBM router also connected the switch. Ethernet
> port of
> the IBM was 192.156.15.254. One computer was
> 192.168.0.2
> that also connect the switch.
>
> Question, I could ping IBM's 192.156.15.254 from
> Cisco
> router, but couldn't do it from that computer. is it
> right? If it was right, how about the reason.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Young
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:09 GMT-3