From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 26 2002 - 10:41:33 GMT-3
Nope, 2065, and 1981,2,3 if you do priority.
This is in fact DLSw+.
I have been looking and it seems there is no way to force DLSw v2
to be used between cisco boxes.
I guess 2067 would be used if you were doing v2 between a cisco
box and another v2 capable router. This should be established in the
UDP capabilities exchange process.
The following link has some v1/v2/+ issues:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls26_rg.htm
but litle info on how to do what can be done.
Let me know if you find something...
yijibin wrote:
>
> Hi,guys
> If you ara asked to limit the dlsw+ bandwidth
> do you care of the tcp port 2067?
> I read the RFC 2166, witch say that the dlsw+ use destination port 2067 to es
tablish the peer connection. But when I use a access-list to monitor these traf
fic ,I get nothing.
> Does the cisco router use the tcp port 2067?
>
> yijibin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:09 GMT-3