From: Phil (ciscostudent1@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 25 2002 - 12:07:44 GMT-3
Louis,
With CRB, you must either bridge or route a protocol in a router, but not both.
With IRB, you can bridge and route the same protocol in a router.
Phil
"Krucker, Louis" <louis.krucker@sunrise.net> escreveu:
Hello
What you think about this solution? I think at the end the result is the same l
ike yours or am i wrong?
bridge crb
int e0
bridge group 1
int e1
bridge group 1
bridge prot ieee
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil
To: Kim_W; Krucker, Louis; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Sent: 25.05.2002 15:53
Subject: RE: simple question
I have to disagree, but I'll state my comment as a question as I've
never used it. Can't you configure a bridge group, let's say between e0
and e1 like this:
bridge 1 protocol ieee
int e 0
bridge-group 1
int e 1
bridge-group 1
bridge irb
bridge 1 bridge ip
This would make e0 and e1 bridge IP and all other interfaces route IP.
Now, if you want the whole router to behave as a bridge for IP you would
have to use the "no ip routing" command.
Phil
Kim_W <KIM_W@bls.gov> escreveu:
Yes, you do if you want to bridge IP.
Without it, "bridge group x" command under interfaces only
bridge nonroutable network protocols through the interfaces.
Wol
-----Original Message-----
From: Krucker, Louis [mailto:louis.krucker@sunrise.net]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:19 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: simple question
Hi Group
I have a simple question about bridging IP on a router.
Do i have to enter "no ip routing" to bridge IP on a router?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:08 GMT-3