From: Krucker, Louis (louis.krucker@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 24 2002 - 15:51:04 GMT-3
Hi,
just a remark
A route to null created by area range or summary-address command
is not a static route because this route is created by ospf with distance
110 and static routes have distance 1 or am i wrong?
Louis
-----Original Message-----
From: yijibin
To: li jian hua
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 24.05.2002 06:48
Subject: Re: Work-around on using null interface
Area range command also make a null route!
You can use 'no discard internel' to disable the ospf process creating
the null route
----- Original Message -----
From: "li jian hua" <jasonli@cisco.com>
To: "Jeongwoo Park" <jpark@wams.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Work-around on using null interface
> area range command does not make null interface
>
> you can use area range command
>
> do not use summary-address command.
>
> rgds
>
> At 20:36 2002-5-23 -0700, Jeongwoo Park wrote:
> >Hi
> >I was wondering what could be equivalent to using null interface.
> >I was redistributing ospf route 170.100.100.6/27 into igrp with the
summary
> >address of 170.100.100.0/24.
> >Once you summary under ospf, it is a must that you should use null
> >interface( ip route 170.100.100.0 255.255.255.0 null 0). Since using
null
> >interface is considered static route, what could be the substitute
for that?
> >I tried with distribute-list, but didn't work.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >JP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:08 GMT-3