From: William Wong Kun Sing (wong_kunsing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 24 2002 - 03:10:45 GMT-3
Hi Andy
The first config is the new method and the second config which is using
map-list is the old method in defining the pvc.
In the IE lab might require you to use the map-list. Keep an eye on that.
Best regards,
William
-----Original Message-----
From: andypilcher2@earthlink.net [mailto:andypilcher2@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:41 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Quick ATM map question
Quick question... what's the difference between the following two configs?
Assume two routers on the ends of an ATM cloud w/ a defined PVC (VPI 0 and
VCI 36). Just trying to get IP connetivity between them. As far as I can
tell the difference is just a level of complexity, they seem to do the same
thing.
in atm0/0
ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
atm pvc 1 0 36
protocol ip 10.1.1.2 broadcast
**OR**
in atm0/0
ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
atm pvc 1 0 36
map-group ATM_MAP
!
map-list atm ATM_MAP
ip 10.1.1.2 atm-vc 1 broadcast
Andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:07 GMT-3