From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 19:18:00 GMT-3
the subinterfaces with the different encapsulations works better, for me at
least
At 10:59 AM 5/21/2002 -0700, Jaspreet Bhatia wrote:
>Folks,
> I have a very simple question about the way something has
> been done in ccbbotcamp lab 3 .
>
>The lab requires that we configure multiple IPX encapsulation types on an
>Ethernet interface . I checked CCO and the only way to do this is by
>creating subif's and associating the different subifs with different encap
>types . When I checked the solution , I see that he has created a
>secondary address on that ethernet interface with a different encap type .
>( This is something CCO does not recommend ) Any ideas of what is the
>right way to tackle this problem???
>
>Thanks
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:04 GMT-3