From: MADMAN (dmadlan@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 18:10:05 GMT-3
No you should not need any neighbor statements to make this work. I'm
haven't done this in a long time so if I'm way off I'm sure someone will
lambast me:)
Dave
anyone have a mutlipoint frame net set up that can verify this
quickly??
"Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
>
> so if this was the hub would rip updates get from spoke 1 to spoke 2? would
> it rquire neighbor statements if so?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MADMAN [mailto:dmadlan@qwest.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:47 PM
> To: Wright, Jeremy
> Cc: 'Mingzhou Nie'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: rip & split horizon
>
> Sure you can:
>
> C1750D(config)#inter ser 0
> C1750D(config-if)#ip spli
> C1750D(config-if)#ip split-horizon
> C1750D(config-if)#^Z
> C1750D#sh ip int ser 0
> Serial0 is up, line protocol is up
> Internet address is 20.1.1.2/24
> Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255
> Address determined by setup command
> MTU is 1500 bytes
> Helper address is not set
> Directed broadcast forwarding is disabled
> Outgoing access list is not set
> Inbound access list is not set
> Proxy ARP is enabled
> Security level is default
> ###Split horizon is enabled###
>
> Split horizon was disabled after I enabled frame encap.
>
> Dave
>
> "Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
>
> > yes a frame network. but cant you go back and manually turn split horizon
> on
> > the interface. obviously this is not real world, im trying to think of
> every
> > stupid possible scenario for the lab.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MADMAN [mailto:dmadlan@qwest.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:13 PM
> > To: Wright, Jeremy
> > Cc: 'Mingzhou Nie'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Subject: Re: rip & split horizon
> >
> > is this a frame network were talking about?? If so split horizon is
> > disable.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > "Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
> > >
> > > without neighbor statements though wouldnt split horizon stop it going
> out
> > > to the other spoke since it is on the same interface
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: MADMAN [mailto:dmadlan@qwest.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:05 PM
> > > To: Wright, Jeremy
> > > Cc: 'Mingzhou Nie'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > > Subject: Re: rip & split horizon
> > >
> > > Yes, without neighbor statements.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > "Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > i understand that. im talking straight physical interfaces. so if the
> > hub
> > > > (r1) receives an update from spoke 1(r2) will it forward the update to
> > the
> > > > other spoke 2 (r3) if you have neighbor statements at the hub pointing
> > to
> > > > the spokes.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mingzhou Nie [mailto:mnie@yahoo.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:07 PM
> > > > To: Wright, Jeremy; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > > > Subject: Re: rip & split horizon
> > > >
> > > > whether split horizon is on or not depends on interface type. main
> > > > interface has it on and subinterface has it off. It has nothing to do
> > > > with using neighbor or not.
> > > >
> > > > --- "Wright, Jeremy" <JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com> wrote:
> > > > > i understand the concept of rip and split horizon. if you have a hub
> > > > > and
> > > > > spoke setup and if you do neighbor statements at the hub pointing to
> > > > > the 2
> > > > > spokes will the update get there with split horizon turned on? i
> dont
> > > > > have
> > > > > the equipment in front of me to simulate this right now. thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ************************
> > > > > Jeremy Wright
> > > > > Network Analyst
> > > > > Archer Daniels Midland
> > > > > ja_wright@admworld.com
> > > > > (217)451-4063
> > > > >
> > > > > ************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:04 GMT-3