From: MADMAN (dmadlan@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 17:13:28 GMT-3
is this a frame network were talking about?? If so split horizon is
disable.
Dave
"Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
>
> without neighbor statements though wouldnt split horizon stop it going out
> to the other spoke since it is on the same interface
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MADMAN [mailto:dmadlan@qwest.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:05 PM
> To: Wright, Jeremy
> Cc: 'Mingzhou Nie'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: rip & split horizon
>
> Yes, without neighbor statements.
>
> Dave
>
> "Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
> >
> > i understand that. im talking straight physical interfaces. so if the hub
> > (r1) receives an update from spoke 1(r2) will it forward the update to the
> > other spoke 2 (r3) if you have neighbor statements at the hub pointing to
> > the spokes.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mingzhou Nie [mailto:mnie@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:07 PM
> > To: Wright, Jeremy; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Subject: Re: rip & split horizon
> >
> > whether split horizon is on or not depends on interface type. main
> > interface has it on and subinterface has it off. It has nothing to do
> > with using neighbor or not.
> >
> > --- "Wright, Jeremy" <JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com> wrote:
> > > i understand the concept of rip and split horizon. if you have a hub
> > > and
> > > spoke setup and if you do neighbor statements at the hub pointing to
> > > the 2
> > > spokes will the update get there with split horizon turned on? i dont
> > > have
> > > the equipment in front of me to simulate this right now. thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ************************
> > > Jeremy Wright
> > > Network Analyst
> > > Archer Daniels Midland
> > > ja_wright@admworld.com
> > > (217)451-4063
> > >
> > > ************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:03 GMT-3