From: Joseph Kimmer (jkimmer@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 20 2002 - 23:37:45 GMT-3
Has anyone seen any problems with ospf virtual circuits while using the
"default passive" command?
I noticed that if you use the "default passive" command and use "no passive
interface x", the virtual links for ospf show that they are in a passive
mode and I don't see anyway to remove their passive status. There is no
"no passive virtual-link" configuration...
This is just an observation. Just curious if anyone has run into this and
came up with a solution other than the obvious (not using passive default
and making each interface passive manually rather than removing their
passive status manually).
Joe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:03 GMT-3