From: donny.mateo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon May 20 2002 - 03:08:28 GMT-3
Hi Irene,
there is a good case study on Doyle but I will try to explain to you.
The host address update is not sent. I think it's received. When one router
adversing a route to the other router where in both router different subnet mas
k
is used on their common link. If the receiving router has a shorter subnet mask
then the sending router, there is a possibility that the sending router would
send a route which has an address host bit set to 1 when the receiving router
applied the shorter subnet mask configured on it's receiving interface.
Take this as an example on Doyle page Routing TCP/IP vol 1 page 224.
The network 172.16.26.5/23 is received by RTR B as 172.16.26.0/32 because when
RTR B put the router to the routing table, it uses the subnet mask on the
interface where it received the route from which in this case has a subnet mask
of /22. and it just happends that 26 has a "1" on the host part of the address.
172.16.00010110, and so it's is considred to be a host adress rather then a
subnet in the point of view of RTR B.
hope that explain, and if I'm wrong pls someone correct me.
Donny
GOLBERY Irhne <irene.golbery@arche.fr>@groupstudy.com on 19-05-2002 23:25:40
Please respond to GOLBERY Irhne <irene.golbery@arche.fr>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc:
Subject: RIP V1 sending update
Hi all,
Need some help to understand in which condition RIP V1 send in it's update
host address ?
Thanks,
Irene.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:02 GMT-3