From: ccielab (route2hell@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 00:04:09 GMT-3
I ran into some serious personal problems here any one whom wishes to take
the Lab for routing switch ccie in Reasearch Triangle Park on May 28 th
Please swap with me other wise Cisco will force me to pay for the lab even
after I called and said they would cancel it over the phone for me.. I will
even swap for Texas, RTPor San Jose. Any time in Late june to whenever
PLEASE HELP ME CISCO DOESN't CARE..BECAREFULL WITH THEM CANCELING LABS OR
SWITCHING DATES
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim O'Brien" <tobrien@cinci.rr.com>
To: <Dan.Thorson@seagate.com>; "Carlos G Mendioroz" <tron@huapi.ba.ar>
Cc: "Groupstudy ccielab list" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:16 PM
Subject: RE: Ipsec over gre tunnel
> So, is it better to encrypt the GRE traffic (encrypt the tunnel itself) or
> is it better to specify the traffic, encrypt it, and then send it through
> the GRE tunnel?
>
> Tim
> CCIE 9015
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Dan.Thorson@seagate.com
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:07 PM
> To: Carlos G Mendioroz
> Cc: Groupstudy ccielab list
> Subject: Re: Ipsec over gre tunnel
>
>
> Why IPSec over GRE? In our case, cuz we wanna send IPX across the
> Internet, but want our IP+IPX traffic to be secure.... so we do IP and IPX
> in the tunnel, and encrypt the whole deal.
>
> danT
>
>
> ========================================
> Dan Thorson - Seagate Technology, LLC
> desk +1 (952) 402-8293 fax +1 (952) 402-1007
> SeaTel 8-402-8293
> ========================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:02 GMT-3