From: Sean C (Upp_and_Upp@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 10:19:31 GMT-3
Hi Eric,
Have you looked in the GroupStudy archives? There maybe answers to some of
your questions:
http://www.groupstudy.com/cgi-bin/wilma/ccielab
I think there has been a lot of confusion with the Darth lab -
contradictions in lab questions, redundant routing protocols on the same
networks, etc. Too be honest, I was about 40% through the lab and decided
to move onto to other study materials - I don't want to waste too much time
trying to dissect someone else's confusion.
Don't worry about being pushed over by the Darth Reid lab - there's other
lab material out there...
Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "eric ong" <ongyongk@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: Darth Reid and general qns inspired by
> Hi guys, my first bunch of qns:
>
> 1. ISDN:
> a. What is the effect of not configuring dialer-group on the dialed
> router? Does it mean that the dialed router's idle timer will never be
> refreshed thus will terminate calls upon idle-timeout or that it will
> never terminate calls?
>
> b. In Darth Reid: ISDN + OSPF demand-circuit in Area 0, the solution shows
> the dialed router has a dialer-list that denies OSPF traffic while the
> dialing router doesn't. www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/config-bri-map.html
> says to deny ospf as interesting on dialing router. So need to deny on
> dialed or dialing or both or none?
>
>
> 2. Routing Protocols & Redistribution
> a. If it was not stated specifically how to advertise a network to achieve
> connectivity, are we free to advertise it under any protocol (and any area
> if OSPF)?
>
> b. If it was not stated specifically, must all routes be
> propagated/redistributed into stub networks or networks that only has the
> backbone router? eg. in Darth Reid: R3 redistributes OSPF into RIP that's
> running on Backbone 2/VLAN10 that only has R6 Backbone connected.
>
> c. In Darth Reid: what is 'Configure EIGRP between R1, VLAN 2 and R4, Ring
> 1, and provide connectivity via EIGRP' asking for? Why did the solution
> have R1 redistribute OSPF into EIGRP?
>
> d. In Darth Reid: Why did the solution have R4 do ip summary-address eigrp
> for 160.100.1.0 when R4 is not connected to 160.100.1.0?
>
>
> Thanks for your help, this Darth Reid is pusing me over to the dark
side...
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:56 GMT-3