From: Kirby, Ron (Ron.Kirby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 10:09:15 GMT-3
If I recall correctly, when I did that lab I had to check Solie's solutions at
ciscopress.com to see how he did it. Anyone that has been to the lab knows tha
t default routes and static's are, for the most part, prohibited. If you check
Solie's lab rules you'll see he doesn't have the default network restriction l
isted, and again, if memory serves, he used a default network statement on R6.
Personally, I can't find any information on getting a shorter mask (/15) into
igrp (/24) that doesn't require some serious contortion of the subnets.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Jia [mailto:ellenjjl@rogers.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:31 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: SKYNET Lab : OSPF/IGRP
Hi,
I know this is an old issue, but when I was doing the SKYNET lab from Karl
Solie's book, I found it difficulty when redistribute OSPF(/15) into
IGRP(/24).
Here is the case, on R2 running eigrp and redistribute the two loopback nets
into eigrp, require to summarize into one network to be advertised. whihout
any default nework and static network, let R6 ping all R2's eigrp network.
151.100.1.1(loop1)/24
151.101.1.1(loop2)/24
R2(eigrp)--140.100.51.52/30 --(eigrp)R1(ospf)--140.100.134.0/24---(ospf)R3(i
grp)---140.100.36.0(24)---(igrp)R6
Generally, on R2 I summarize the two network as: 151.100.0.0/15, while on R3
is a /24 network, how can I let R3 redistribute it into IGRP?
Thanks
Joe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:56 GMT-3