From: Craig Columbus (Craig.Columbus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 08:36:09 GMT-3
The 1750 is a lot of overkill for a home office. However, assuming that
you already have those deployed, I'd go with the router-to-PIX setup. This
way, the client doesn't have to worry about initiating the session and you
don't have to worry about anyone screwing with the settings on the VPN client.
Example configs can be found on Cisco's site.
Just my $0.02....
Craig
At 02:35 AM 5/14/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Guys
>Need some input on this.
>
>Office ADSL to Internet. 1750 with ADSL interface
>connects to ISP. PIX 520 used.
>
>Employees have ADSL at home to Internet with 1750 ADSL
>router interface.
>
>The question= to grant access to employees (from their
>homes) to office LAN,
>
>Should we have 1750 <-> PIX VPN
>or user home PC <-> PIX VPN ?
>
>Some employees do not have ADSL, so have to use PC <->
>PIX VPN.
>
>Where can I find step by step procedure for both of
>the above scenarios?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:56 GMT-3