From: Jai Prakash Shukla (jshukla@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 13 2002 - 01:05:34 GMT-3
For minimum guarantee for bandwidth do you have to use CBWFQ???
Just a thought.
JP
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Michael Kilpatrick
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 5:43 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Generic Traffic Shaping - Fatkid Lab #461
In Fatkid Lab #461, can someone please verify the given solution for item
#5.
Item #5 says:
5. Configure R3 so that users on the Token Ring segment get at least 16K of
bandwidth, but not more than 32K, for their telnet traffic, and the
remaining
bandwidth for everything else.
And the given solution is:
interface Serial0
traffic-shape group 101 16000 32000 32000 1000
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me that this does nothing
to
guarantee users get at least 16K of bandwidth. In addition, this
traffic-shape
command would allow bursts up to the 64k access-rate and would apply a tc
interval of 2 seconds which would be very inefficient.
I think the solution should read:
interface Serial 0
custom-queue-list 1
traffic-shape group 101 32000 4000 0
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet
queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 tcp telnet
queue-list 1 default 2
queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 100
queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 300
Can someone please verify?
Thanks alot! Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:55 GMT-3