From: Edward Monk (emonk@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 11 2002 - 17:41:14 GMT-3
I think you meant to type .SOB domain. (Darn typos) I sometimes get
confused but I just read some of the posts on this list and sooner....
than later... I am sure that's the domain we all belong in.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Christopher Jarosz
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 1:06 AM
To: Antonio Marfil; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Will CCIEs qualify for a .pro domain name?
I personally like the .god domain.......
chrisj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio Marfil" <tony.marfil@networxcorp.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:55 PM
Subject: OT: Will CCIEs qualify for a .pro domain name?
> This should be of interest:
> http://www.msnbc.com/news/750722.asp
>
> Is anyone lobbying for CCIEs to qualify for a .pro address? To the
other
> CCIEs either with numbers or soon to be, would you guys be interested
in
> qualifying for a .pro domain? Under the current standard it doesn't
look
> like we qualify. This is ironic considering that we network engineers
are
> the ones that keep the IT infrastructure that makes this all possible
> running smoothly. Any thoughts or comments?
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Marfil, CCIE #9011
> Senior Network Engineer
> NetworX Corporation
> tony.marfil@networxcorp.com
> http://www.networxcorp.com
> --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:54 GMT-3