From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 10 2002 - 17:14:35 GMT-3
At 4:02 PM -0400 5/10/02, Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de wrote:
>Howard,
>
>If the solution require a Virtual link, can I add both ends of the tunnel to
>a new area 2.2.2.2, then create a virtual link across this area?
>
>Sam
>
One end of a virtual link, by definition, MUST be in area 0.0.0.0;
both ends MAY be.
If R1 and R3 were both in area 0.0.0.0, you could reconstitute it
with a virtual link through R2 in a nonzero area. It just doesn't
seem to be a virtual link application.
You might want to try Scenarios S0001-S0004, which are intended to be
run in sequence (building on one another), in the Gettlabs FTP server
at 12.107.238.3 (login anonymous, password your email address). Look
in the beta scenario directory. I'm still writing parts 5 and 6, but
they have a disgusting number of interacting virtual links, tunnels,
etc.
-- "What Problem are you trying to solve?" ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** ******************************************************************************* * Howard C. Berkowitz hcb@gettcomm.com Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:54 GMT-3