From: Chris Hugo (chrishugo@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 22:53:23 GMT-3
Hi all,
Going through Doyle I and there is a question #5 on page 327 that states on fig
ure 3.27 that asks why isn't the 192.168.1.0/24 route entry not entered in Camp
anella's routing table.
Doyle's answer on page 972 Answer #5 states that the problem is due to a split
horizon rule that is enforced from the Eigrp protocol.
I would think that this is instead a problem with a protocol not being able to
use another protocol as a transit protocol. But I could be wrong?
The redistribution scenario is ospf-to-Eigrp AS1 and mutual redistribution betw
een Eigrp AS#1 and Eigrp AS#2. Their is no redistribution between Eigrp AS#1 an
d the OSPF process.
PS.The core router is the main redistribution point: Eigrp AS#1, Eigrp AS #2 an
d an OSPF process. No redistribution is done elsewhere in the scenario.
Could somebody PLEASE validate Doyle's answer.
Thank You,
chris hugo
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Mother's Day is May 12th!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:54 GMT-3