From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 17:01:39 GMT-3
on r6 by putting the promiscuous keyword and a remote-peer statement
contradict each other...promiscuous allows it to automatically accept peer
connections while the remote-peer statement is a static definition...
as for stopping keepalives, add the option "keepalive 0" to the local peer
statement
At 09:12 AM 5/9/2002 -0400, Curtis Phillips wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I have been trying unsuccessfully to keep BRI interfaces down while using
>dynamic tcp peers betwwen two routers
>connected by ISDN.
>
>The peers are not forming a DLSW cir but are connecting intermittantly.
>
>I found a dlsw netbios keepalive-filter command which has been apllied to
>both dlsw peers.
>the thing continues to come up and teh debug output indicates netbios packsets
>are causing it.
>Routing protocols are not the isssue as I am using static routing.
>Anyone see any issues or have any lucjk with a similiar config?
>
>
>Here are the pertinent area of my configs..
>
>R6
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 15.15.6.6 promiscuous
>dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 15.15.5.5 keepalive 0 lsap-output-list 200 timeout 90
>dynamic
>access-list 200 permit 0xF0F0 0x0101
>dlsw bridge-group 1
>dlsw netbios-keepalive-filter
>
>
>
>R5
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 15.15.5.5
>dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 15.15.6.6 keepalive 0 lsap-output-list 200 timeout 90
>dynamic
>access-list 200 permit 0xF0F0 0x0101
>dlsw bridge-group 1
>dlsw netbios-keepalive-filter
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Curtis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:54 GMT-3