Re: OT: Single Router Mode redundancy

From: MADMAN (dmadlan@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 11:03:42 GMT-3


   
  Who in the world said SRM is not supported by Cisco????

  SRM works well and I prefer it over config sync in systems with dual
MSFC's. It takes three whole commands and your up and running. I am
running SRM in the lab right now and at serverl customer sights.

  Why would you want to leave the second MSFC in ROMMON? I never heard
of this option as it seems redicules on it's face since the reason I
assume you bought two SUP/MSFC's is for redundancy.

  Dave

"Waters, Kivas (UK72)" wrote:
>
> I am looking at implementing SRM within a gigabit MAN consisting of 8 Cat
> 6509's. Only 1 MSFC per chassis is required so SRM seems like a good
> option. Leaving the second MSFC with a blank config is not supported by
> Cisco and putting the MSFC into ROMMON mode is only supported until Dec 2002
> according to Cisco documentation on the web. In contrast TAC say that SRM
> is not at all supported by Cisco.
>
> http://www.cisco.sh/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_3/confg_gd/r
> edund.htm#xtocid1228929
>
> Does anyone have any informational titbits to offer wrt SRM?
>
> best regards
>
> Ki
>
> Kivas Waters
> CCIE #8652



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:53 GMT-3