From: Bauer, Rick (BAUERR@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 08:28:40 GMT-3
That can be turned off for connectivity through firewalls or if you don't
want to queue it.
dlsw udp-disable
-----Original Message-----
From: Erhan Kurt [mailto:kurt@superonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:19 AM
To: steven.j.nelson@bt.com; cc13@attbi.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
These Tcp ports for setting up the DLSW circuit. UDP 2067 is used for
communication between peers. (try with debug)
In terms of QoS, it's better to choose this port.
Never Give Up,
Erhan
-----Original Message-----
From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com [mailto:steven.j.nelson@bt.com]
Sent: 09 May}s 2002 Per~embe 09:23
To: cc13@attbi.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
Dennis
I think you will find if you read through this that I have never mentioned
2067, I had however mentioned that doc at CCO mentioed 2065 in
prioritisation, See below :-
<Snip>
>I have found the relevant document on CCO, the URL is :-
> >
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw5_rg.htm
> >
> >Interestingly enough it states that ports 2065 is also only used when
> >prioritisation is required.
<Snip>
It was actually Erhan who stated that UDP port 2067 is needed not me.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis [mailto:cc13@attbi.com]
Sent: 08 May 2002 17:59
To: Nelson,SJ,Steven,IVNH25 C; ccielab
Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
Sorry Steve,
I beg to differ. I have been following the posts and I read that link many
times and I don't see port 2067 mentioned anywhere. Didn't you follow the
thread before telling me that I wasn't?
I ask again... does anyone have a link on CCO or otherwise that mentions
that port 2067 should be used in dlsw custom queuing?
Regards,
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
steven.j.nelson@bt.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 11:41 AM
To: cc13@attbi.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
Dennis
You haven't been following the posts have you ?
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw5_rg.htm
Thanks
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis [mailto:cc13@attbi.com]
Sent: 08 May 2002 16:22
To: ccielab
Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
Do you have a link on CCO that states this? I've heard this before but
could never find a link to verify.
Cheers,
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Erhan Kurt
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi; ying chang; steven.j.nelson@bt.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: stephen.paynter@bt.com
Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
Hello my friend Mamoor,
Also add: permit udp any any eq 2067
Never Give Up,
Erhan
-----Original Message-----
From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi [mailto:mamoor@ieee.org]
Sent: 08 May}s 2002 Gar~amba 17:32
To: ying chang; steven.j.nelson@bt.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: stephen.paynter@bt.com
Subject: Re: DLSW Custom Queuing.
The below that steve have given is the best link for the dlsw queuing and
stuff.
Every where at the CCO i have seen that when u want to give priority or
custom-queue to dlsw they have used the access-list and called the port #s
in it and then applied it to the queuing . I guess this the finest way to do
that.
access-list 100 permit tcp any eq 2065 any
access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 2065
if using dlsw priority then also do the same for 1981,1982,1983
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: ying chang <ying_c@hotmail.com>
To: <steven.j.nelson@bt.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <stephen.paynter@bt.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:49 AM
Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
> Steve,
>
> Thanks for the info. However, let's go back to the original question:
>
> "I was wondering does anyone have a URL that outlines the behaviour of
> custom queuing when using DLSw keyword. i.e That this keyword permits SNA
> traffic only and not all DLSw traffic"
>
> The above question troubles me a little bit, because if I interpret the
> statement correctly, what you are saying is if I use the dlsw keyword in
my
> access-list, then SNA traffic will be allowed to go through, but not
NetBIOS
> or other non-routable traffic.
>
> Why a port number has anything to do with different layer's traffic? From
> the web page, I suspect the dlsw keyword probably is the same as port
2065,
> and we'll only have to worry about the port numbers when the priority
queue
> is applied. Otherwise, as far as the custom queue concern, port 2065
should
> be sufficient. I know this contradict with the answers I've seen in the
> past, but I'm more confused than ever when I think about the statement.
>
> Well, I guess I'll have to spend sometime to test it out and see what's
> going on. Until then, if anyone knows when I have to use the the keyword
> "dlsw" and when I should not (other than priority queue), please let me
> know.
>
> Thanks,
> Chang
>
>
> >From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> >Reply-To: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> >To: ying_c@hotmail.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >CC: stephen.paynter@bt.com
> >Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
> >Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 18:25:52 +0100
> >
> >Chang Et al,
> >
> >I have found the relevant document on CCO, the URL is :-
> >
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw5_rg.htm
> >
> >Interestingly enough it states that ports 2065 is also only used when
> >prioritisation is required.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ying chang [mailto:ying_c@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: 07 May 2002 17:14
> >To: Nelson,SJ,Steven,IVNH25 C; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: DLSW Custom Queuing.
> >
> >
> >Hi Steve,
> >
> >I also have the same question. Have you verified it can only send SNA
> >traffic already? If you haven't, I would say setup two PCs and see if
> >NetBIOS traffic can pass thru the pipe would be a quick way to verify
this
> >behavior. After you finish this, you can use dspu to see if there's any
SNA
> >circuits. I'm not working on DLSW right now, but please keep me posted,
> >because I'd like to know the answer too.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Chang
> >
> >
> > >From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> > >Reply-To: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: DLSW Custom Queuing.
> > >Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 16:20:26 +0100
> > >
> > >All
> > >
> > >I have noted and tested the scenarios using custom queuing to restrict
> > >bandwidth on an interface based on packet sizes, and I have used as
> > >mentioned in this list the access list for DLSw ports instead of the
DLSw
> > >keyword in the queuing argument.
> > >
> > >I was wondering does anyone have a URL that outlines the behaviour of
> > >custom
> > >queuing when using DLSw keyword.
> > >
> > >i.e That this keyword permits SNA traffic only and not all DLSw
traffic,
> >I
> > >have searched CCO but cannot find any reference to it.
> > >
> > >Thanks in advance
> > >
> > >Steve
> > >
> > >Steve Nelson
> > >Customer Engineer
> > >BT Ignite- National Solutions
> > >T: +44 (0)1422 338881 M: +44 (0)7811 944172
> > >e-mail: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> > >pp HW A170, PO Box 200(HOM-NZ), London, N18 1ZF
> > > > British Telecommunications plc
> > > > Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
> > > > Registered in England no. 1800000.
> > > > This electronic message contains information from British
> > >Telecommunications plc which may be privileged or confidential. The
> > >information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or
entity
> > >named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any
> > >disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> > >information
> > >is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error,
> > >please
> > >notify us by telephone or email (to the numbers or address above)
> > >immediately.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:53 GMT-3