RE: ATM

From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 03:44:13 GMT-3

• Next message: Katson PN Yeung: "RE: Different between CIR/minCIR and Frame-relay traffic-rate command."
• Previous message: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx: "RE: DLSW Custom Queuing."
• Maybe in reply to: Venki: "ATM"
• Next in thread: MADMAN: "Re: ATM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Venki,

It sounds like you are asking what can be tested in the lab. In that case it
is possible that ATM will be in the lab as per the CCIE web site at Cisco.
Check the site for details.

Cheers,

Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
Manager, Network Control Centre
POWERTEL
Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
* sinclairj@powertel.com.au

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Venki [mailto:jayavenkad@hotmail.com]
                Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2002 15:31
                To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
                Subject: ATM

                Hi wats the future of ATM.Will it be still there....or
everybody is moving
                towards new technologies like Gigabit...
                Still do we have to concentrate on ATM for the Lab
preparation....because i
                cant get the proper details on what exactly should be
prepared for the
                LAB...

                Regds
                Jv
        

• Next message: Katson PN Yeung: "RE: Different between CIR/minCIR and Frame-relay traffic-rate command."
• Previous message: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx: "RE: DLSW Custom Queuing."
• Maybe in reply to: Venki: "ATM"
• Next in thread: MADMAN: "Re: ATM"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:53 GMT-3