From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 09:48:37 GMT-3
I would assume that if you don't exceed the backplane or the routing
capability, the number of VLANs shouldn't matter. For a 5500 with RSM,
you've got 3.6 GB backplane, and about 1 MPPS to play with, from what I
remember.
Chuck Church
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
US Tennis Association
70 W. Red Oak Lane
White Plains, NY 10604
914-696-7199
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Ahmed Mamoor Amimi
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 2:05 AM
To: Jaspreet Bhatia; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: What is the practical limit on the number of VLANs on a CAT
5K
I guess u can go upto 1024 without impacting the CPU and memory if it is
standard.
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Jaspreet Bhatia <jasbhati@cisco.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:50 PM
Subject: What is the practical limit on the number of VLANs on a CAT 5K
> Folks,
> I have a very simple question . I am using a SUP III G
> with RSFC on a CAT 5500 . How many VLANS can I create without impacting
the
> CPU and memory utilization too much . I know this is dependent on a lot of
> other factors also like traffic. Let us say moderate amount of traffic
will
> be routed between the VLANs. Please let me know if more clarifications are
> needed .Thanks
>
> Jaspreet
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:52 GMT-3