From: Don Dettmore (don@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 09:47:26 GMT-3
You are right, it is useful to use this command in a mixed EIGRP/RIP
environment.
This is a common practice in large scale WAN environments. The overhead of
large RIP/SAP tables across a WAN link is tremendous. However, Novell
Servers must run RIP to function (of course they do not understand EIGRP).
As far as the RSUP-ONLY keyword, I've never run across a situation that
required it. Typically if you run EIGRP across the WAN link you turn RIP
off and allow the automatic redistribution to take place.
Anyone out there have a situation that required the RSUP-ONLY?
Don Dettmore
CCIE 8555
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larson, Chris (Contractor)" <Chris.Larson@ed.gov>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:27 AM
Subject: ipx sap-incremental eigrp autonomous-system-number rsup-only
> I noticed a post relatting to this and had some additional questions. CCO
> states the ipx sap-incremental eigrp autonomous-system-number rsup-only
will
> turn of EIGRP for that interface, which it seems to when I test it. I do
not
> understand what the idea is behined this. If I run this, and my eigrp
routes
> go dead or I clear route cache, then there is no more routing. What would
be
> the point of this. If I were running RIP and eigrp I suppose that would be
> o.k. but from a practical standpoint why would a person do that instead of
> just running one protocol??
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:51 GMT-3