From: ying chang (ying_c@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 04 2002 - 16:38:04 GMT-3
Please ignore the question. "ipx sap-incremental" is enabled by default on
serial interface. I should read it more carefully.
>From: "ying chang" <ying_c@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "ying chang" <ying_c@hotmail.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: ipx sap-incremental rsup-only
>Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 14:52:37 -0400
>
>Can someone explains why the following sample configuration files use "ipx
>sap-incremental eigrp 999 rsup-only" instead of "ipx sap-incremental eigrp
>999"? Is this because of the router is running both eigrp and rip? If this
>is the case, don't we need "ipx sap-incremental eigrp 999" to take care of
>eigrp?
>
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/cs005.htm#xtocid162479
>
>(Watch the wrap)
>
>Thanks,
>Chang
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:50 GMT-3