Re: Match Statement in Route-map

From: elpingu (elping@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 04 2002 - 01:55:52 GMT-3


   
well i said I always undestood it as OR from the statement in CC0 and the reaso
n
below in practice is why I say that

I say it is an OR due to the fact that one can in a route map
say

example 1
route-map foo 10
match tag 101 102 103
or
example 2
route-map foo 20
match ip add 1 2 3 4

try it....; )
now can a route carry multiple tags ? NO .....in example 1 if the route tag is
101 then is permited OR if it is 102 then that toute is permited....therefore
that says to me ...IT IS AN OR

In example 2 it can match acces-list 1or 2 OR 3 and it will satisfy the
route-map..

Ping

Nick Shah wrote:

> well, it would certainly mean an AND operation, wont it ?
>
> for eg.
>
> if xyz matches conditionB....
> & xyz matches conditionB
> set clauses .....
>
> so CCO says if one condition doesnt match, route is ignored, that will be an
> AND operation.
>
> Nick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "elpingu" <elping@acedsl.com>
> To: "Krishnan Narayanan" <krishnan.narayanan@cwgoindia.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Match Statement in Route-map
>
> > you know ....always have read it as an OR clause.
> > read below from cco
> >
> > . Any route that does not match at least one match clause relating to a
> route-map command will be ignored;
> >
> > just to be sure i get it right .....I make two route maps to refer to my
> clauses.
> >
> > Ping
> >
> > Krishnan Narayanan wrote:
> >
> > > If I have multiple match statements in a route-map ,is an AND operation
> performed or an OR opertion done ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > KRis.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:50 GMT-3