From: George Hansen (HansenG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 03 2002 - 21:13:50 GMT-3
That was just a cut and paste error on my part. Only the first line is needed.
George
>>> Paul <p_chopin@yahoo.com> 05/03/02 04:25PM >>>
Thanx.Could you explain - why do I need second
statement?
Paul
--- George Hansen <HansenG@radiological.com> wrote:
> Try this:
>
> access-list 900 permit rip AA0.0000.0000.0000
> F.ffff.ffff.ffff
> access-list 900 permit rip AAF.0000.0000.0000
> F.ffff.ffff.ffff
>
> The network part of the mask has been auto-trimmed
> down from 0000000F. I don't have the equipment to
> test it, but I have a similar list disallowing EIGRP
> IPX routes with distribute-list in.
>
> George
> # 8546
>
> >>> Paul <p_chopin@yahoo.com> 05/03/02 09:01AM >>>
> That's what I thought to , but doesn't seems to
> work.
> Paul
> --- Jason Gardiner <gardiner@sprint.net> wrote:
> > Actually, I think it would be
> >
> > 0000.0000.00a0 ffff.ffff.fff0
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason Gardiner
> > Supervisor, Engineering Services
> > Sprint Internet Backbone Operations
> >
> > "You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and
> > still come out completely dry. Most people do."
> >
> > Norton Juster
> >
> > On Fri, 3 May 2002, Chuck Mason wrote:
> >
> > > Paul,
> > > Wouldn't this get it?
> > >
> > > access-list 900 permit rip AA0.0000.0000.0000
> > > ffff.ffff.ffff
> > > access-list 900 permit rip AAF.0000.0000.0000
> > > ffff.ffff.ffff
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Paul
> > > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:35 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: IPX access lists
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi guys,
> > > Anybody knows answer to this question- how would
> > you
> > > allow only ipx networks AA0 to AAF in rip
> > updates.Does
> > > it require standard or extended ipx access
> lists?
> > > I can't find it anywhere on CCO.
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:50 GMT-3