From: Joseph Ezerski (jezerski@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 21:21:25 GMT-3
RADB Whois query for AS17676
aut-num: AS17676
as-name: GIGAINFRA
descr: BB Technologies Corporation.
admin-c: Takeshi Tsutsui
tech-c: Takeshi Tsutsui
import: from AS9225 action pref = 100; accept ANY
import: from AS3549 action pref = 200; accept ANY
import: from AS2914 action pref = 500; accept ANY
import: from AS4694 action pref = 600; accept ANY
export: to AS9225 announce AS-GIGAINFRA
export: to AS3549 announce AS-GIGAINFRA
export: to AS2914 announce AS-GIGAINFRA
export: to AS4694 announce AS-GIGAINFRA
notify: admin@bbtec.net
mnt-by: MAINT-AS17676
changed: moris@bbtec.net 20020116
source: RADB
aut-num: AS17676
as-name: JPNIC-JP-ASN-BLOCK
descr: Japan Network Information Center
country: JP
admin-c: JNIC1-AP
tech-c: JNIC1-AP
remarks: Block of 32 AS numbers from AS17673 to AS17704
mnt-by: MAINT-JPNIC
changed: hostmaster@apnic.net 20010326
source: APIRR
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:24 PM
To: 'CCIE Groupstudy'
Subject: RE: BGP tables increasing significantly
Multiple ISPs are seeing UUNet as stable, but now see up to 30K
announcements from AS 17676.
At 12:42 PM -0400 5/2/02, Scott Morris wrote:
>Hehehe... Cool. AS 705 is UUNet. They must have laid off all their
>BGP techies.
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Howard C. Berkowitz
>Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:24 PM
>To: CCIE Groupstudy
>Subject: RE: BGP tables increasing significantly
>
>A little more information from the NANOG list that might help people
>protect their BGP routers. The excess routes all seem to be coming
>from AS 705. You might want to put in an AS path filter blocking
>everything from there, and open it up only if users report
>connectivity problems.
>
>
>At 11:33 AM -0400 5/2/02, Dennis wrote:
>>Don't you follow the list??? This was pounded into the ground
>yesterday
>>complete with everyone posting their bgp numbers!
>>
>>Dennis
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>>Lupi, Guy
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:05 AM
>>To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>>Subject: BGP tables increasing significantly
>>
>>
>>Has anyone else noticed that their bgp prefixes received from their
>>providers has gone up by about 3 to 4 thousand routes in the last week
>or
>>so? Is there an "issue" somewhere on the net? Or is this something
>that
>>happens periodically and I am just now noticing it?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:49 GMT-3