From: Chris Hugo (chrishugo@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 00:52:56 GMT-3
Never mind folks,
For people that have the Doyle 1 book I substituted the connection between Love
tt and Hariman as an Ethernet connection instead of a serial connection. Once I
reconfigured the scenario to use a serial connection between Lovett and Harima
n the scenario worked fine.
Guess IGRP don't consider a hop when the path traverses an Ethernet to Etherne
t link between routers. Can anyone explain?
The only other modification the lab that I made is to use Ethernet between Harr
iman and Kennan which shouldn't make a difference.
thanx,
chris hugo
Hi folks,
Just going through Doyle #1 and the rule about unequal-cost load sharing (Speci
fically rule #2 Page 253).
This rule states that "the next-hop router must be metrically closer to the des
tination. That is, it's metric for the route must be smaller than the local rou
ter's metric." etc.
I simulated the scenario but I am still able to get all routes in. His scenario
is on page #261 under the Case Study: unequal-cost load balancing, again.
I was wondering if anybody was able to simulate this scenario successfully....
thanx,
chris hugo
PS. IOS is 12.1(8)
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:48 GMT-3