RE: BGP Route-Reflector vs. Confederations

From: Adam Atkinson (Adam.Atkinson@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 29 2002 - 06:54:02 GMT-3

• Next message: fathnallah said: "dlsw bgroups/ring-list question"
• Previous message: cyberoy: "Re: Destination NAT"
• Maybe in reply to: kym blair: "BGP Route-Reflector vs. Confederations"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
> How would you solve the following example:
>
> AS2-----AS1--------------AS1-----AS2
>
> .........R1----R3---R4---R5.........

> Would you set up a route-reflector with 3 clients, or would
> you set up
> confederations?

I'd make R3 and R4 route-reflectors, not in the same cluster
(i.e. I wouldn't explicitly configure clusters at all).

I'd make R1 a client of R3 and R5 a client of R4.

• Next message: fathnallah said: "dlsw bgroups/ring-list question"
• Previous message: cyberoy: "Re: Destination NAT"
• Maybe in reply to: kym blair: "BGP Route-Reflector vs. Confederations"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:21 GMT-3