RE: IPXWAN unnumbered and EIGRP

From: George Spahl (g.spahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 28 2002 - 17:23:27 GMT-3


   
Guy,
I tried for a long while and couldn't get either one of your configs to
work. I wasn't able to get EIGRP to establish an adjacency with its
neighbor using the IPXWAN. Then finally I went ahead and put IPX
addresses on the interfaces, added them to the EIGRP process and let the
adjacency come up normally. Once the adjacency was established
everything worked fine and I could change the interfaces to use IPXWAN
using either config and it worked just fine. The IPXWAN debug still
shows that it chooses RIP for the IPXWAN link (in the absence of NLSP
being configured on both routers), but when I looked at the routes that
had been exchanged across the IPXWAN they were, indeed, EIGRP routes!
Couldn't have been more surprised. Was this something you just
experimented with or do you have a link that speaks to using EIGRP with
IPXWAN? I looked everywhere and couldn't find anything. Thanks again
for the configs.

George

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Lupi, Guy
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 12:20 PM
To: 'George Spahl'; 'Erhan Kurt'; 'Curtis Phillips';
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPXWAN unnumbered and EIGRP

To turn off rip for all networks, use no network all under the rip
config.
I don't believe that no ipx router rip works, since rip is always on by
default. To get ipx ipxwan to work with eigrp, you can do a couple of
things:

This method uses network number 14 as the ipx wan network number.

R4

interface Serial0
 ip address 14.14.14.4 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip mroute-cache
 ipx ipxwan 0 14 r4
 no fair-queue

r4# sh ipx eigrp neigh

IPX EIGRP Neighbors for process 100
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
                                        (sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 14.0000.0011.0000 Se0 11 00:01:50 16 200 0 2
r4#

R1

interface Serial1
 ip address 14.14.14.1 255.255.255.0
 ipx ipxwan 0 14 r1
 clockrate 1300000

r1#sh ipx eigrp neigh

IPX EIGRP Neighbors for process 100
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
Type
                                        (sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 14.0000.0044.0000 Se1 12 00:02:50 8 200 0 2

r1#

This method uses no network number, but the internal network is in the
ipx
eigrp config:

R4

ipx internal-network 44
!
ipx router eigrp 100
 network 44
!
interface Serial0
 ip address 14.14.14.4 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip mroute-cache
 ipx ipxwan 0 unnumbered r4
 no fair-queue

r4#sh ipx eigrp neigh

IPX EIGRP Neighbors for process 100
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
                                        (sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 0.0000.0011.0000 Se0 11 00:03:35 13 200 0 6
r4#

R1

ipx internal-network 11
!
ipx router eigrp 100
 network 11
!
interface Serial1
 ip address 14.14.14.1 255.255.255.0
 ipx ipxwan 0 unnumbered r1
 clockrate 1300000

r1#sh ipx eigrp neigh

IPX EIGRP Neighbors for process 100
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
Type
                                        (sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 0.0000.0044.0000 Se1 10 00:01:05 278 1668 0 6

r1#

~-----Original Message-----
~From: George Spahl [mailto:g.spahl@insightbb.com]
~Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 4:52 PM
~To: 'Erhan Kurt'; 'Curtis Phillips'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
~Subject: RE: IPXWAN unnumbered and EIGRP
~
~
~Curtis,
~I'm also unable to make IPXWAN work with IPX EIGRP. I've tried it with
~IPX EIGRP configured on both sides of a point-to-point (HDLC) link and
~IPX RIP turned off on both sides. I've also tried numbered and
~unnumbered on the IPXWAN.
~Whenever I bring up the link and watch the debug it looks like IPXWAN
~negotiates RIP for the link and then when I look at the routers I see
~that there have been RIP routes exchanged across the link. This even
~though I had issued a "no ipx router rip" prior to bringing up the
~IPXWAN link. I previously thought that IPXWAN supported EIGRP, but I
~guess that isn't the case. It seems that IPXWAN supports only NLSP and
~IPX RIP (in that order of preference)and not EIGRP. Has anyone seen
~this work differently?
~George
~
~
~
~-----Original Message-----
~From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
~Erhan Kurt
~Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:34 AM
~To: Curtis Phillips; ccielab@groupstudy.com
~Subject: RE: IPXWAN unnumbered and EIGRP
~
~Use network internal network in EIGRP
~No net in RIP
~
~Erhan
~
~
~-----Original Message-----
~From: Curtis Phillips [mailto:cphillips@blazenet.net]
~Sent: 26 Nisan 2002 Cuma 15:48
~To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
~Subject: IPXWAN unnumbered and EIGRP
~
~Hello All,
~
~Is nay one aware of how to configure IPX EIGRP over an unnumbered
~interface
~with IPXWAN enabled.
~It appears that RIP successfully is negotiated by default(When isn't
~it:-) )
~But I am having difficulty getting RIP shut down over the link
~and EIGRP
~working.
~
~How is rip disabled without network number?
~How is EIGRP enabled without network number?
~
~Thanks in advance,
~
~Curtis



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:21 GMT-3