RE: ospf and igrp

From: Alex Paulino (Alex@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 01:20:10 GMT-3


   
Hi Bob, i already has tried this, but it dont works properly. I think is becaus
e the R1 has in you table the /29 network directly connected, and the /27 is in
 backbone area.

I tried also redistribute connected in R1 (only the /29) and make a summary-add
ress, this works fine.

For the /27 i did the same thing, but, in the R3 router.

I dont know if this is the better sollution, but is the unique that works.

let me know what you think..

thanks a lot again,

alex

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Sinclair [mailto:bsin@erols.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:59 AM
To: Alex Paulino
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ospf and igrp

Alex,

Try the following on R2:

area 1 range 140.10.200.0 255.255.255.0
area 0 range140.1.20.0 255.255.255.0

On R1, redistribute ospf into igrp. This works for me with a very similar set
up. Should see 140.10.200.0/24 and 140.1.20.0/24 on R1 and R0.

-Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Paulino" <Alex@2s.com.br>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:47 PM
Subject: ospf and igrp

> Hi all, i know that this subject already was commented, but i'm still in
> doubt.
>
> R0)-----140.1.56.0/24 -----R1 -----140.1.200.0/29 -----------R2
> -------140.1.20.0/27-----------R3
>
> Between: R0 and R1 - IGRP
> between: R1 and R2 - OSPF AREA 1
> between:R2 and R3 - OSPF AREA 0
>
> 1) My problem is the /27 (area0) and /29 (area1) doesn't appear in R0 (igrp).
> I have tried to put a "area 1 range 140.1.200.0 255.255.255.0" in R2 or R1,
> and, this route never up in R0. I don't know if is correctly.
>
> 2) I don't know what to do in /29 case. :-(
>
> thanks for help
>
>
> Alex



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:19 GMT-3