Re: precedence

From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 00:27:01 GMT-3


   
So what should we use when we are told that prioritize traffice so that they
are escaped first.... 5 or 7.... what is our limit.

-Mamoor

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter van Oene <pvo@usermail.com>
To: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi <mamoor@ieee.org>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: precedence

> control traffic generally flows with 111. Hence, if you set your data
> traffic to 111, your routers with no longer be able to prioritize control
> packets which can have rather negative effects when the dropping
> begins. Many times 111 and 110 are also handled with equal priority which
> may be the reason why cisco advises against both.
>
> Pete
>
>
> At 08:07 PM 4/24/2002 +0500, Ahmed Mamoor Amimi wrote:
> >Can some expert tell me why it is not recommended precedence value of 6
and 7.
> >I have seen at CCO that it will produce potential problem with the core
data
> >traffic like routing and other signalling.... if this is so then why
these
> >value are given to be configured.
> >
> >
> >
> >-Mamoor



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:19 GMT-3