From: Lupi, Guy (Guy.Lupi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 24 2002 - 22:55:48 GMT-3
When you say sessions, do you mean dlsw peering sessions or actual dlsw
circuits between hosts? I believe that they are saying that all active
circuits between hosts will remain active, but if there are no circuits
established the peer drops immediately. Do you have a circuit active when
the primary becomes reachable again?
~-----Original Message-----
~From: steven owen [mailto:trueccie@yahoo.com]
~Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:39 PM
~To: ccielab
~Subject: about "linger" on dlsw backup peer
~
~
~The following is got from CCO
~"If the linger keyword is set to 0, all existing
~sessions on the backup router immediately drop when
~the primary recovers. If the linger keyword is
~omitted, all existing sessions on the backup router
~remain active (as long as the session is active) when
~the primary recovers, however, all new sessions
~establish via the primary peer."
~
~But i found when i set "linger 0" or omit "linger",
~the result is same ,i.e., all existing sessions on the
~backup router immediately drop when the primary
~recovers.
~
~
~Thanks.
~
~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:19 GMT-3