From: Lupi, Guy (Guy.Lupi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 11:47:24 GMT-3
No, no bridging. It was probably a one time thing, I am going to set it up
again today with the same router, we will see if it happens again.
~-----Original Message-----
~From: DAN DORTON [mailto:DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us]
~Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:08 AM
~To: Lupi, Guy; ccielab@groupstudy.com; mamoor@ieee.org
~Subject: Re: Catalyst port security problem
~
~
~Were you bridging on this port?
~
~I had a similar issue with doing dynamic port security.
~
~I setup the port for the learned mac of the router plugged into it.
~
~Later I setup a bridge group on it & it was learning an
~address of another router running DSPU through the bridge group.
~
~Hence: It did what it was supposed to! ;)
~
~>>> "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi" <mamoor@ieee.org> 04/21/02 08:39PM >>>
~I guess ur stuck in the age-time of port security .... check
~out this .... :
~
~http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel
~_6_3/config/s
~ec_port.htm#xtocid76308
~
~try clearing the security and reenable without the age time..
~
~-Mamoor
~
~
~----- Original Message -----
~From: Lupi, Guy <Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com>
~To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
~Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:16 AM
~Subject: Catalyst port security problem
~
~
~> I had a 2611 hooked up to my 5500 the other day with port
~security turned
~> on. It worked fine for about 6 hours, then all of the
~sudden the switch
~> shut the port down due to a security error. I looked, and
~the switch was
~> reporting that a totally different mac address was plugged
~into that port.
~> I looked at the 2611 and it was fine, same mac address that
~was in the
~port
~> security filter. Has anyone seen this before? If turning on port
~security,
~> is it a good idea to lock the mac address down to something
~other than the
~> bia? Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:16 GMT-3