From: Steven Owen (trueccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 06:07:51 GMT-3
Do you mean this when some time if you don't know a remote-peer's ip address?
If two dlsw router configured "local-peer ...promiscuous",no remote peer config
,
they can build peer relation once they have route to each other?
Right?
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: <steven.j.nelson@bt.com>
To: <trueccie@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: when should we use" promiscuous" keyword in dlsw config?
> Steve
>
> also a useful tool when configuring border groups, i.e peer to peer
> connectivity when no remote statements are present and you have no direct
> peer to the device that you want to connect to.
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Owen [mailto:trueccie@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 22 April 2002 09:23
> To: ccielab
> Subject: when should we use" promiscuous" keyword in dlsw config?
>
>
> The CCO explains like this "(Optional) Accepts connections from
> nonconfigured remote peers."
> when you config a dlsw local-peer.
> So does this keyword just save us remote peer configs?any other use ?
> or when do we have to use it ?
>
> Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:16 GMT-3