From: Ali (muali_cisco@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 15 2002 - 19:45:30 GMT-3
You RID changed when you restarted the OSPF process, change your
virtual-link configs
Ali
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Mason" <romason0916@hananet.net>
To: "Ryaboy Vadim" <VRyaboy@acuson.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 7:19 PM
Subject: RE: router-id - quick question
> An additional note about the router-id.
>
> I just forgot to nail the router-id to the x.x.1.1 or
> x.x.2.2 loopback as I generally do. I have a couple of
> other loopbacks configured to simulate interfaces that
> I do not have on the router. Here is the message the
> router returned. I think this is relatively a
> relatively new enhancement.
>
> 01:34:10: %OSPF-3-RECONF_VL: OSPF process 10 is
> changing router-id. Reconfigure
> virtual link neighbors with our new router-id
>
> I am running:
> System returned to ROM by power-on
> System image file is
> "flash:c1700-bnr2sy-mz.121-5.T9.bin"
>
> cisco 1750 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x501) with
> 27853K/4915K bytes of memory
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Ryaboy Vadim
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 8:29 AM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: router-id - quick question
>
>
> Hello,
> Is it legal on the lab to assign router id to the
> router ?
> For example, if router 3 is using ospf and virtual link
> is involved - as a
> good practice use command router-id 3.3.3.3 (assuming
> that is no ip network
> 3.x.x.x anywhere on the network). Of course, I will
> restart opsf process,
> but looks like IOS even prompting me for it.
> Any strong opinion against that practice?
> Thank you.
> Vadim.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:08 GMT-3