From: Gannon, Stephen [IT] (stephen.gannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 13 2002 - 14:22:00 GMT-3
Disabling arps on both sides works. I was thinking of a case when I don't
have access to both routers, maybe it's not a valid scenario for the test.
Thanks all,
SG
-----Original Message-----
From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com [mailto:steven.j.nelson@bt.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 3:17 AM
To: stephen.gannon@citigroup.com; mamoor@ieee.org; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: no frame inverse-arp
Stephen
It may be a stupid question but do you have the commands on both sides of
this link, it maybe the remote end is announcing it's l2 to l3 mapping to
you.
If not try disabling inverse arp and arp for frame at both ends.
Ta
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Gannon, Stephen [IT] [mailto:stephen.gannon@citigroup.com]
Sent: 12 April 2002 21:48
To: 'Ahmed Mamoor Amimi'; Gannon, Stephen [IT]; Nelson,SJ,Steven,IVNH25
C; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: no frame inverse-arp
clear frame ina only clears the mapping until the next reload or interface
shut and no shut.
SG
-----Original Message-----
From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi [mailto:mamoor@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:44 PM
To: Gannon, Stephen [IT]; steven.j.nelson@bt.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: no frame inverse-arp
do a clear frame-relay-inarp
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Gannon, Stephen [IT] <stephen.gannon@citigroup.com>
To: <steven.j.nelson@bt.com>; <stephen.gannon@citigroup.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: no frame inverse-arp
> OK tried both commands and reloaded. no good. it still maps the Ip
address
> to DLCI 105.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com [mailto:steven.j.nelson@bt.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:31 AM
> To: stephen.gannon@citigroup.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: no frame inverse-arp
>
>
> you need both command under the frame interface
>
> no arp frame
> no frame inverse
>
> Ta
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gannon, Stephen [IT] [mailto:stephen.gannon@citigroup.com]
> Sent: 12 April 2002 14:00
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: no frame inverse-arp
>
>
> If I turn off inverse arp 'no frame inverse arp' on an interface why does
> the router still map DLCI 105 172.168.2.1 on that interface? Clear frame
> inarp only works until the next reload. Can I stop the router from
learning
> about that, incorrect in this case, ip address? Is there any case that
this
> map would interfere with normal routing. It does not seem to disrupt ping
> tests to the real 172.168.2.1.
>
>
>
> Config
>
> IOS 12.1.9 - c2500-p7-l_121-9.bin
>
>
>
> interface Serial0
>
> ip address 172.168.1.3 255.255.255.128
>
> encapsulation frame-relay
>
> ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
>
> clockrate 64000
>
> dce-terminal-timing-enable
>
> frame-relay map ip 172.168.1.1 100 broadcast
>
> frame-relay map ip 172.168.1.4 100 broadcast
>
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>
>
>
> r3#sh frame map
>
> Serial0 (up): ip 172.168.1.1 dlci 100(0x64,0x1840), static,
>
> broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active
>
>
>
> Serial0 (up): ip 172.168.2.1 dlci 105(0x69,0x1890), dynamic,
>
> broadcast,, status defined, active
>
>
>
>
> Serial0 (up): ip 172.168.1.4 dlci 100(0x64,0x1840), static,
> broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> SG
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:07 GMT-3