RE: DLSW backup peer

From: Tarek Sabry (tsabry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 11 2002 - 00:41:46 GMT-3

• Next message: Tarek Sabry: "RE: IP TCP Intercept question"
• Previous message: Hansang Bae: "Re: OT: Redundancy at the PC level"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeongwoo Park: "DLSW backup peer"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Jeongwoo

I don't see a problem there. That should be a valid case. However it doesn't
look very resilient because the R1--R2 link is common, so if this one fails
then all fails.

Tarek

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jeongwoo Park
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:25 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: DLSW backup peer

Hi all
I have a scenario where R1--R2--R3
R2 is dlsw remote backup
R3 is dlsw remote primary
I was wondering how R2 is backup R3.
So if I shut down R3, would it fail over to R2 and R2 become primary peer ?

Thanks
JP

• Next message: Tarek Sabry: "RE: IP TCP Intercept question"
• Previous message: Hansang Bae: "Re: OT: Redundancy at the PC level"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeongwoo Park: "DLSW backup peer"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:04 GMT-3