Re: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions

From: Shahram Esfahani (sham@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 10 2002 - 08:56:42 GMT-3


   
Tim,

Possibly bad fiber? I would suggest configuring UDLD on all your Gig
ports. I know the 6500 supports this and presume the 3500 series do as
well.

/Shahram

 On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Ouellette, Tim wrote:

> Team,
>
> can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our
> 6509's. Port 7/2 is connected via fiber to a 3524 closet switch. We've
> tried replacing the gbic's on both the 6509 and 3524. The port keeps going
> from connected state to non-connect stat and the trunk port messages
> underneath is what we see. Can anyone offer any suggestions?
>
>
>
> distribution 6509 port 7/2 -----fiber----- cisco3524
>
>
>
> 2002 Apr 08 22:26:26 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk
> 2002 Apr 08 22:26:52 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk
> 2002 Apr 08 22:30:19 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk
> 2002 Apr 08 22:30:23 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk
> 2002 Apr 08 22:30:28 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk
>
> distribution6509> (enable) sh port 7/2
> Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type
> ----- ------------------ ---------- ---------- ------ ----- ------------
> 7/2 Tk1382014101-0/1 notconnect 1 full 1000 1000BaseSX
>
>
> Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex
> ----- -------- --------- ------------- -------- -------- -------- -------
> 7/2 disabled shutdown 0 0 1 enabled 95
>
> Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr
> Shutdown/Time-Left
> ----- -------- ----------------- -------- -----------------
> ------------------
> 7/2 0 - - - -
> -



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:03 GMT-3