DLSW - Another question...this time in colour...

From: Nicolai Gersbo Solling (nicolai@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 09 2002 - 11:05:58 GMT-3


   
Hi there Guys...

Well...It is actually not in colour, but what will a man not do to drag
attention...

Anyway...I have a problem with DLSW...

I wan't to have full connectivity between Ethernet, Ring1, Ring 2 for
bridged traffic...

I have the following Setup

Etherenet--R1-----DLSW-----R2-----DLSW----R3--Ring2
                                    |
                                    |
                                Ring 1

The routers have the following loopbacks:
1.1.1.1=R1
2.2.2.2=R2
3.3.3.3=R3

So far I have the following configured...

R1:

dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 group 1 promiscous
dlsw bridge 1

Int ethernet0
bridge-group1

R2:
dlsw local peer peer-id 2.2.2.2 group 1 border
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 3.3.3.3

source-bridge ring-group 201

int TokenRing 1
source-bridge 1 1 201
source-bridge spanning

R3:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 3.3.3.3 group 1 promiscous

source-bridge ring-group 200

int TokenRing 1
source-bridge 2 1 200
source-bridge spanning

I got the above config to work, but I have one big question...

The way that the border group command works is that R2 caches reachability
information for R1 and R3 - When R1 sends out an explorer frame regarding a
machine, mac-address, netbios-name, whatever... This will be sent to R2,
which replies back and tells R1 - Connect to R3 on this IP address...This
sets up a peer connection from R1 to R3...

Is my understanding correct?

Now...here is my question...(finally)

Is there any way to get the connection from R1 to flow over R2 and then to
R3?
I wan't to limit my number of DLSW peers in the network, so could it be done
so that the traffic from R1 flows to R2, which then forwards to R3?

Any ideas, or does DLSW require point-2-point connections?

Nic



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:00 GMT-3