From: Frank B (frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 07 2002 - 21:02:28 GMT-3
Ali,
I believe you're current config blocks those networks cited in
access-list 14 from coming "out of" EIGRP into IGRP. Since they exist
only in the rip & igrp domains the command should have no effect.
You should place the distribute-list statement under the EIGRP
process and remember to read it as distribute-list 14 "out of" igrp 10.
I don't have time to verify this but I believe that's how the
"distribute-list out" command works. Let me know what you come up with.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ali
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 12:03 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Q. eigrp/igrp red
Guys;
I am trying to block two network from being advertised to eigrp from
igrp.
What am i doing wrong here?
R7
/ \
rip / \ igrp10
/ \
R3 ------ R4
eigrp10
195.1.1.0 & 195.1.2.0 are directly connected to R3 and advertised via
RIP. R7
is doing mutual red bet RIP/IGRP10.
R4
!
router eigrp 10
passive-interface Serial0
network 150.100.0.0
default-metric 10000 100 255 100 1500
no auto-summary
no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
!
router igrp 10
redistribute connected
passive-interface Ethernet0
network 172.16.0.0
default-metric 10000 100 255 100 1500
distribute-list 14 out eigrp 10
!
access-list 14 deny 195.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 14 deny 195.1.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 14 permit any
!
TIA
/Ali
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:59 GMT-3