From: ying chang (ying_c@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 05 2002 - 20:45:26 GMT-3
Thank you! That's what I've seen so far. Do you have any practical example
when we want to use 'bgp bestpath as-path ignore'? Or it's just another BGP
manipulation tool? I have no problem to follow along Parkhurt's example, but
not clear why we want to use it under normal condition.
Chang
>From: "D. J. Jones" <meganac@attbi.com>
>Reply-To: "D. J. Jones" <meganac@attbi.com>
>To: "ying chang" <ying_c@hotmail.com>, <Samb@cisco.com>,
><atulpawar@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: BGP Load balancing
>Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 13:00:22 -0800
>
>maximum-paths installs multiple paths in the IP routing table if the paths
>are learned via the
>SAME neighboring AS.
>
>dj
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "ying chang" <ying_c@hotmail.com>
>To: <Samb@cisco.com>; <atulpawar@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:38 PM
>Subject: Re: BGP Load balancing
>
>
> > I can only make it work when the network coming from the same AS. Are
>you
> > sure we can do it with multiple ASes?
> >
> > Chang
> >
> >
> > >From: "Sam" <Samb@cisco.com>
> > >Reply-To: "Sam" <Samb@cisco.com>
> > >To: "atul pawar" <atulpawar@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: Re: BGP Load balancing
> > >Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 11:17:46 -0800
> > >
> > >you need to say maxpath X, where X from 1- 8, 1 is by default
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "atul pawar" <atulpawar@hotmail.com>
> > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:40 PM
> > >Subject: BGP Load balancing
> > >
> > >
> > >Hi Guyes
> > >If AS1 is getting information about Network X from AS2 and AS3 via
>ebgp.
> > >If all metrics are similar the last criteria used to choose the best
>path
> > >is
> > >Lowest router ID. If I use the command
> > >'no bgp bestpath compare-routerid' will it do the load balancing?
> > >
> > >Atul
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:57 GMT-3