From: Jim Newton (jnewton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 05 2002 - 12:25:04 GMT-3
Maybe this would be good if you didn't want to advertise out a certain
interface, but still wanted it to form an adjacency and receive routes. If I
am not mistaken, passive-interface also suppresses hellos. But at this point
I may very well be wrong, as my brain is really fried lately.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of John
Neiberger
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 7:46 AM
To: Phil; Larry Whitfill ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Re: OSPF LSA's
Sure. If you add an interface to OSPF using a network
statement and then make it passive, that network gets
advertised into OSPF but no OSPF packets will leave that
particular interface.
John
---- On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, =?iso-8859-1?q?Phil?=
(ciscostudent1@yahoo.com.br) wrote:
>
> John,
> Can you use passive-interface with OSPF?
> Phil
>
> John Neiberger <neiby@ureach.com> escreveu: Why would you
want to run
> OSPF on an interface, only to deny
> all LSAs from crossing the link? Perhaps the passive-
interface
> command would be your friend?
>
> Then again, do you want hellos to pass? Then use the database
> filter command. Again, I must ask...why? why?? WHY??? :0)
>
> John
>
>
>
> ---- On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Larry Whitfill (whitfill@cox.net)
> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to control LSA flooding.
> >
> > If I create a totally stubby area in OSPF, I block all but
> type 1, and 2
> > LSAs (plus a single type 3). Using the "area filter list,"
I
> assume we
> > can
> > block even the default type 3 LSA. Is there a way to block
> even types 1
> > and
> > 2 without using the "OSPF database filter" command?
> >
> > I've been racking my brain for a month and haven't found a
> good
> > solutions.
> >
> > Thanks for the help!
> >
> > Larry
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:56 GMT-3