From: Chua, Parry (Parry.Chua@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 05 2002 - 02:39:37 GMT-3
John, you are right, in my case, route in R5 with the right mask will able to
redistribute to a classful routing protctols but not in R4 as we can see what i
s in the routing table (different mask). There is situation we cannot block the
null route.
Parry Chua
////////////////
-----Original Message-----
From: John Neiberger [mailto:neiby@ureach.com]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Chua, Parry; <Pablo.Narvaez@getronics.com>; Jason; Ahmed
Mamoor Amimi; Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com
Cc: 'Mas Kato' ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RE: OSPF to IGRP redistribution (I know this has been
killed, th i s is short I promise)
Yes, that will work. However, to make this like the original
scenario, on the router that includes the distribute list you
should try to redistribute that summarized route into another
protocol, like IGRP. It won't work because the route is not in
the table.
This technique only works if the routes are remaining in OSPF.
If you find a way to configure this so that the redistributing
router does not have the route in its table yet it still
redistributes it into IGRP, please let me know.
As it stands, I don't see how you could make it work.
Regards,
John
//////
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:55 GMT-3