Re: IP Precedence

From: Gregg Malcolm (greggm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 04 2002 - 15:39:11 GMT-3


   
Thanks..I like it !! Pretty easy to remember.

Gregg

----- Original Message -----
From: "fwells12" <fwells12@hotmail.com>
To: "Gregg Malcolm" <greggm@sbcglobal.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: IP Precedence

> How about this.
>
> preference
> is
> for
> faster
> control
> in
> networking
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gregg Malcolm" <greggm@sbcglobal.net>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:05 AM
> Subject: Fw: IP Precedence
>
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Does anyone have any good memory tips for remembering the 8 levels of IP
> > precedence ? (kind of like the old worn out All People Seem To Need
Data
> > Processing).
> >
> > It's on the CD but somewhat hard to find.
> >
> > 0 routine
> > 1 priority
> > 2 immediate
> > 3 flash
> > 4 flash-override
> > 5 critical
> > 6 internet
> > 7 network
> >
> > As a side line, I spent a few minutes searching for protocols/features
> that
> > can take advantage of IP precedence (I was studying DLSW
prioritization).
> > Here's what I found:
> >
> > RED/WRED
> > IP-to-ATM CoS
> > DLSW TOS
> > CAR
> > RSVP
> > Voice
> > BGP QPPB - Sure hope that's not on the test
> > GRE Tunnels
> > MPLS - Doesn't really count in this forum
> >
> > I'm sure there are more. Do I have any of these wrong ?
> >
> > Thanks, Gregg



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:54 GMT-3